LBC Arvostelua 

NEVER USE LBC. It is useless and will take your package years to arrive

Claire Foges this woman is trying to scare people, if you dont agree with her, she would shout! Crazy.
There is No democracy, and free speach in UK.
And yes, Claire, royal is usless! They paid you to wind us up. Pointless radio. Eveeything will be pointless in UK, if No free speach, and this will never happen thanks to people like Claire, who worked for Boris.
Hehehehe
You are all seeking power, and only small minds do that.

I doubt LBC can "improve" given their shut-down of listener complaints. There is no "Customer Complaints" at LBC! Ferrari and Dale endlessly berate the BBC at the first opportunity. OFCOM seldom respond to a complaint lodged against LBC (which are legion.) It's a shame for the more recondite presenters, and there are some. And why do LBC charge for phone texts when they don't even acknowledge receipt (let alone a response?) LBC in its day was an informative and innovative station. Sadly not now, with one or two exceptions. JC

It’s a one sided platform I called in a gave my view of the situation the uneducated minimum wage women who answers calls started raising her voice I just hung up she sound like she has severe mental health issues

James you work in a call centre for a few hours and get paid £250,000 approx 😂😂😂😂

Be careful... The Whatsapp messaging seems to have ceased. So I've been texting them. At 21p/text. Yes they charge outside your normal text bundle. I wasn't aware of this. Don't get caught..

I've been listening to LBC for many years, and it's frustrating to notice that the callers I hear mostly either agree with the presenter or are mocked and made to sound foolish. I've tried multiple times to share my views, only to be told they'll call me back or to be cut off altogether. I believe there's a lack of diverse opinions, which diminishes the richness of the discussion.

Nothing impartial about this bunch of bias self obsessed cretins.

Each one bought and paid for at different tables.

Most are rude and patronising when anyone gives a different take to theirs.

Used to listen a lot. Can't now, the absolute bias nonsense I hear makes my blood boil.

Sack them all and start again. Most are patronising, condescending and down right rude at times.

3 minutes of Vanessa Felz condescending BS to a listener because the listener didn't agree with her tall tale. Had to turn it off.

Used to be an avid listener, I was going off LBC as it’s generally the broadcasters giving their opinion. The final straw has been Ian Payne joking about a leaving a trapped fox in his underground car park, to waste away. A radio station advocating animal cruelty, unbelievable. Won’t be listening any more!!

This is my personal opinion as someone who has listened to LBC for many years. The station once claimed to give ordinary people a voice and let the public speak and be heard. What it does now is shape what people think by setting the limits of discussion and deciding which opinions are acceptable.

LBC has turned into a media go-between for Westminster and the public. Every major policy or controversy whether it’s welfare reform, immigration, taxation or climate targets is presented as open debate yet it always leads to the same conclusion: quiet acceptance of whatever has already been decided by government or its advisers.

You can hear it in how presenters frame their questions. They’ll ask whether a policy is being “rolled out too quickly” or “needs fairer balance” but never whether it’s fundamentally wrong. The same assumption always stands – that big government knows best and the public must adapt.

Take the small boat crossings for example. Day after day LBC talks about the dinghies coming across the Channel. Listeners are repeatedly told these people are professionals fleeing danger. Any attempt to question the legality or impact of these crossings brings either silence or moral lectures. The presenters sound more like campaigners than journalists. They guilt-trip anyone who questions the situation and act as if there is only one acceptable opinion.

The same pattern appears across every topic. Welfare reform debates never question whether the policies are unjust only whether they can be delivered more efficiently. Climate discussions ignore cost and practicality and focus on how soon measures can be forced through. Every subject is treated as settled before it starts. Anyone who challenges the framing is quickly labelled extreme or ignorant.

Many of the early and mid-day presenters make things worse. They invite callers to “have their say” then interrupt or talk over them as soon as a view appears that doesn’t match their own. It’s rude, patronising and transparent. Too many of them behave as though disagreement is beneath them.

LBC’s audience deserves far better. Listeners tune in expecting a real range of opinion yet get a recycled set of ideas that always support the same establishment view. The same “experts” and commentators are wheeled out to repeat what we’ve already heard a hundred times before. The public are there only to fill the gaps between adverts.

Over time this has worn people down. Listeners stop expecting honesty or variety and start repeating the same arguments they’ve absorbed from the presenters. It’s not open debate any more it’s conditioning by repetition. The trick is not censorship but exhaustion. If you hear one side often enough you eventually stop questioning it.

LBC once prided itself on challenging authority but now it feels like part of it. The debates sound rehearsed the outrage sounds managed and the final message always aligns with the same political agenda.

I once listened for the variety and genuine argument. Now it feels like one long lecture from people who already think they’re right. If you want honesty, fairness and free thought this isn’t where you’ll find it.

Rating: 1 star. LBC no longer leads Britain’s conversation. It controls it on behalf of those already in power.

Nick Ferrari is horrible, unbalanced siding the Nataniahu goverment.The genocide committed by the israelis is ok for Ferrari. Only only person is worth listening to Is James O Brian.
Rest is rarher unknowledgable.

Matthew Wright gets apologetic with rage and shuts down any listener if they try to give their views on migrants and immigration.It is so sickening to hear because listeners can never debate with him on any issues as he knows it all and the listener is stupid and dumb dumb dumb to him.Iain Dale is so rude and disrespectful to the viewer if the listener has a different view to him.I am surprised this man has not been taken off the air.Thats the whole point of LBC to debate and be able to express a different opinion.Nick Ferrari doesn’t seem to know a lot of facts on multiple occasions despite being a Journalist.Ian Payne all he does is waffle waffle waffle on and on about nothing nothing nothing.The presenter that is the best who I respect and never hear degrading or patronising the viewers is Clive Bull he’s the best presenter on LBC.

I really like to listen to Nick Ferrari but this morning I had to switch off. It was the usual conversation about child benefit and the callers plus Nick agreeing that people shouldn’t’t be paid for having children. That people would squander child benefit on booze, drugs and cigarettes. How judgemental is that and so insulting. I had my children in the late sixties. Family allowance then wasn’t given for the first child but for subsequent children. We had three. Goodness we couldn’t wait to have children to get the allowance or so we would be portrayed .It is very expensive bringing up a family. I used to save mine up to buy clothes and school uniforms. Don’t allow this program to insult people, it’s horrible.

A new low this morning with Ian Payne discussing how long it takes him to pee!!

LBC - please set up a debate with a moderator (Marr would be good) between Ferrari and o’Brien. Imagine the combined total of regular listeners - they would all listen in. Advertisers would pay the max for a slot.

Personally I think Ferrari would wipe the fooor with o’Brien given he is level headed, doesn’t carry the burden of a destructive ego, takes a pragmatic not emotive approach to issues of the day, and is generally far more credible…but that’s just my opinion.

Go on do it…it makes sense.

Ian Dale like a few others think their opinions are correct and everyone else is wrong, so one sided if anyone dosnt agree puts more pressure trying to make he is always right. Don't listen anymore just boring one sided presenters.

Fake news, propaganda

Advert breaks are far too frequent.
I used to listen to LBC a lot but not any more as I'm fed up with listening to all the adverts. I understand that they are funded by adverts and they are necessary but there are far too many now.
They also have a clever way of cutting callers off even when they have a very good point but the presenter disagrees and can't win the argument. They do this by secretly cutting the caller off while the presenter is talking and then go on to criticize them when they have no way of continuing to put their point across.

Here we go again, the vile agitators of hate doing what they do best, shame on the presenters for not leading Britains conversation but adding to the hate and division in this country. Congratulations on giving hate a platform! Go get a proper job you shower of grifters.

I would like to object in the strongest possible way to something that happened on the James O'Brien program on Thursday 11th September. I know James O'Brien likes to edit and clip events, videos and audio to suit his narrative but to blatantly edit something and present as facts creates what he professes to object to. James O'Brien creates hate and division with his continued editing of events, audio and videos. James O'Brien knows exactly what he is doing, proof of this is when he likes to repeat phrases like "The Farage Riots " . So what happened on his program on Thursday 11th September. He played a clip trying to prove Charlie Kirk was a racist. The clip seemed to show that Charlie Kirk was concerned that the pilot being black proved he was racist. If what was said was played in it's entirety it would show that Charlie Kirk was talking about DEI and was the pilot selected for the job because of his qualifications or because of his skin colour. Like many people I do not agree with everything they say but I accept the principle of "Agreeing to disagree " without the need to cancel or object in a hateful violent way. If James O'Brien had done proper research he would find that Charlie Kirk went to places like college's and universities and debate with anyone regardless of their views. If at the end of the debate there was disagreement he would politely and respectively accept what was debated. Unfortunately there are some who are unable to do this and have to resort to hate and violence. I realise that there are hateful people from both the "Right" and "Left" but why does the hate and violence seem to be more prevelnt from the "Left" as shown by the joy of Charlie Kirks death by some. Unfortunately James O'Brien appears to allow his hate for some to corrupt rational thoughts and by displaying this hate on his program is very concerning. So back to the reason for sending this message James O'Brien who professes to have honesty and integrity and likes "Counting" should out of respect to Charlie Kirk play the whole clip of Charlie Kirk talking about the pilot which proves Charlie Kirk was not being racist. Not everything is is related to skin colour.