Groover Arvostelua 

Real results and feedback, these I will use to improve my craft.

Un très bel outil pour partager et faire connaître ton projet musical à travers le monde.

sont super christelle/ damien /mathilde /come /alex de because music t'accompagne du debut a la fin sur tes demarches musicales(ep, clip, droits musicaux,media,tremplin,charts,....)....te donne de l'espoir beuacoup de live cours sont programmer avec abonnement abordabe à 9,90 par mois, on t'apprends a te faire connaitre, ta des cours de droot en musique, auteurs, SACEM etc, des masterclasses... feedback avec grooviz sur tes morceaux....j'y etais deux trois ans dommage que les opens mis se remplissent tres vite ....j'ai du abandonné car je passait plus sinon je recommande

I love groover it’s very useful for your music

I've gained several months of experience as an indie artist. Personally, I find it distasteful when positive feedback ultimately leads to a rejection because of some minor inconvenience. Groover is currently unacceptable to me!

Creio, é essencial a qualidade do trabalho do artista para tudo fluir
. Ao ter essa percepção, o curador pode levar a canção colocado no Groover a um patamar mais elevado e ser reconhecida em diversas praças. É o caso de minha song "Vagalume", com o Araçá Vermelho. Vale lembrar que sou um escritor afro-brasileiro, autor do premiado livro de contos "Circo de Pulgas". Assino os meus trabalho com o nome artístico "Manto Costa". Vide Google

These guys are great. Great customer service, great vibes.

Before using Groover, I often wondered if anyone would listen to my songs at all.

Today, I still get rejected sometimes, but that's no longer the most important thing.

What matters is that people are listening. Some curators hear things I couldn't hear myself. Some point out weaknesses in my mixes. Some encourage my songwriting. Little by little, those comments help me become a better artist.

For me, Groover is not only about promotion. It is also a place to learn.

Thank you to everyone who took a few minutes to listen to a song made by an independent artist sitting alone in a small room somewhere in Thailand.

It means more than you may realize.

I like groover, there are very reliable to use, I prefer them 🙏👍🔥

Le système de délai est très frustrant : attendre 7 jours pour que la majorité des curateurs répondent à la dernière minute juste pour refuser, c'est irrespectueux. De plus, ils se lavent les mains en disant que le morceau sonne super bien, que la prod est propre etc., uniquement pour justifier le fait qu'ils gardent notre argent sans nous ajouter. Certe c’est de l’investissement, c’est peu etre pas garanti d’être ajouté dans les playlists mais ça reste une perte d'argent totale pour les artistes indépendants.

Tras analizar la plataforma a fondo y contrastar la experiencia con un amplio grupo de músicos profesionales con los que comparto red, considero que el modelo de negocio de Groover presenta fallos estructurales graves que penalizan sistemáticamente al eslabón más débil: el artista independiente.

​Incentivo perverso del rechazo: Al cobrar el curador la misma tarifa (Grooviz) por aceptar que por rechazar, el sistema se convierte en un bucle de monetización de la frustración.
El curador se ve incentivado a escuchar envíos de forma masiva a última hora para no perder el dinero del vencimiento, resultando en escuchas de escasos segundos y decisiones apresuradas.

​Saturación y opacidad de las playlists: Una playlist saludable tiene un espacio limitado (entre 50 y 100 canciones) para garantizar una rotación real. Groover no limita los envíos masivos a curadores que ya tienen sus listas colapsadas. El músico paga a ciegas sin saber si físicamente cabe en la playlist, y el curador se ve obligado a emitir un feedback subjetivo e intrascendente para justificar un rechazo que, en realidad, es por falta de espacio.
​
Calidad del feedback y salud mental: Las respuestas obligatorias de los curadores carecen a menudo de criterio crítico o técnico; son justificaciones genéricas y contradictorias que solo generan confusión, dudas innecesarias y un desgaste dañino en la autoestima de los creadores.

​Falta de filtros frente a perfiles oportunistas: Aunque existen buenos curadores, están sepultados bajo una masa de perfiles sin formación musical real que operan bajo el puro gusto subjetivo.

Peor aún es la aceptación de propuestas de 'compartir en redes' que resultan ser páginas de Facebook o cuentas con muy pocos seguidores y nula interacción; auténticos pueblos fantasma digitales.

​Retorno de inversión (ROI) ineficiente: El impacto real en estadísticas tras entrar en las playlists que ofrece la plataforma es mínimo. El presupuesto acumulado necesario para ver algún movimiento equipara a Groover con los costes de agencias de PR profesionales o campañas optimizadas de Meta Ads, las cuales ofrecen una eficiencia y una propiedad de los datos infinitamente mayor.
​El sistema actual, dada la subjetividad extrema de los curadores, está más cerca de la dinámica de azar de un casino que de una herramienta profesional de difusión musical.

I love groover because they have the ability to help up coming artist grow

Si può migliorare

I've been using Groover to promote my music and overall I've had a positive experience. As an independent artist, one of the biggest challenges is getting your songs in front of the right ears, and Groover makes that process much easier.

What I like most is the guaranteed feedback. Not every curator is a perfect fit, and not every submission results in a playlist placement, but I always receive a response and often gain useful insight into how others hear my music. I've received playlist placements, curator support, and some valuable feedback that helped me better understand where my music fits in today's market.

The platform is easy to use, transparent, and gives independent artists access to curators, bloggers, radio stations, and playlist owners that would otherwise be difficult to reach.

Like any promotion service, results will vary depending on your music and the curators you choose. My advice is to research your targets carefully and be realistic about expectations. Used that way, Groover can be a valuable tool for artists looking to expand their audience and learn more about how their music is perceived.

Overall, I've found it to be a worthwhile part of my music promotion strategy.

Groover is very great! Transparent and easy to use. Just great to help contacting curators, bloggers and radie stations.

Great service! Helped me a lot! Gonna use it again in the future

I was skeptical about paying for the service but tried it anyway. I was pleasantly surprised and impressed that my music found an audience. Although I had more rejection than approval it was a great learning experience and I know what I need to do moving forward.

Lo esperado.Consiguen que puedas distribuir tu música y darla a conocer en países que sería imposible de otra manera.

Groover is a very inexpensive way for a song creator to get feedback from someone who may (or may not) be a songwriter and may (or may not) be a knowledgeable critic of song composition, performance or production. But if you get even one piece of useful advice, it might be worth it.

I believe that artists who succeed with Groover have accurately identified the sub-genre of their music and do enough research regarding curators to find a good match for their music.

I have been writing songs for decades and as a kid briefly recorded with Columbia Records. My sub-genre is currently a type of acapella crossed with folk, blues and bossa nova. When Spotify creates a “Radio” from my music I get Pentatonix type artists.

I received 7 responses after sending songs to 11 curators. Small sample, but instructive. I could not successfully find a “home” for my music. I can accept that the songs I sent were not a good fit for these curators. While it is possible that non-responders never got around to my song, my intuition tells me that after curators listened to a few bars, they determined that the song did not fit their interests and did not take the time to respond. I do not fault them for that.

For the small amount of money involved in sending to curators I did not expect them to expend a lot of time and energy trying to help me get connected to better targets.

I would like to get more exposure on Spotify, which seems like a hard nut to crack. After further research into the content of many curator Spotify playlists, I noticed that a lot of Groover playlists cap at 130 songs and often include songs by the curator. That made me question whether getting a song included in a playlist would result in much exposure on Spotify.

On SoundCloud my catalog already has gotten over 20,000 plays and picks up another 100 or so every few days without me doing any promotion at all.

So, for now, I decided to create my own playlists on Spotify based on Spotify “Radio” for my music “sub-genre.” Who knows if anyone will listen to my playlists, but I might do no worse than working with Groover. And maybe, I’ll end up becoming a Groover curator.