Ambiguous Terms and Conditions - Who Owns Your Work?
I have asked his site several times whether their AI is Artificial General Intelligence, and whether our work is used to improve itself. Yet I have not received a reply.
As a creator, I want to know my work is mine, even if I am only using this site to improve my (already fully created) works. Their Terms and Conditions are vague and ambiguous, at best, and the fact they refuse to reply to personal emails asking important intellectual property questions is disturbing and makes me suspicious, as it should make anyone. Their Terms and Conditions, which outline their the agreement, states:
"This Agreement does not transfer to you any intellectual property owned by the Operator or third parties, and all rights, titles, and interests in and to such property will remain (as between the parties) solely with the Operator."
However, it does not clearly define what is classes at its IP. If I am inputting my work, then it should not become theirs because I have used their website to aid or help me improve my work. That work is still mine, yet their terms do not say this.
Although I only use this service for my previously created work, I would suggest Sudowrties' terms are even more worrisome if you do not create the work beforehand. Why, as a service provider, can't you clarify 'clearly' that the works produced belong to the receiver/consumer? Whether reworked with Sudowrites' help or paid for by a consumer, it should belong to the customer who spends all the hours making the changes needed. After all, that's what they're paying for. So, why not make this clear in your Terms and Conditions?
Sudowrites appear to check Trustpilot to guide itself in its improvements, yet, as usual, it fails to reply to its consumers. This says a lot about any company looking to build trust and confidence with its customers.
23. maaliskuuta 2024
Oma-aloitteinen arvostelu