Skydentalclinic Arvostelua 

Very negative experience. After the first session, they even forgot the IV needle in my arm. During the next visit, anesthesia was injected in the wrong spot without proper checks, and one of my teeth was broken during filing. I also waited two extra hours.
The most serious issue was with the crowns: instead of a proper screw-retained system made in a lab, they cemented them without informing me or asking for consent. This caused severe gum pain for a week, and after two weeks two implants became loose.
I was also prescribed antibiotics without stomach protection, causing further issues, and they refused to reimburse the expenses for my third trip.

Esperienza molto negativa. Alla prima seduta hanno persino dimenticato l’ago della flebo nel braccio. Nella successiva, anestesia fatta nel punto sbagliato senza controlli e un dente rotto durante la limatura. Ho anche atteso due ore oltre l’orario previsto.
Gravissimo il lavoro sulle corone: invece di un sistema a vite realizzato in laboratorio, le hanno incollate senza informarmi né chiedere consenso. Questo mi ha causato forti dolori gengivali per una settimana e, dopo due settimane, due impianti hanno iniziato a muoversi.
Inoltre, mi è stato prescritto un antibiotico senza protezione gastrica, causandomi ulteriori problemi, e si sono rifiutati di rimborsare le spese del terzo viaggio.

I would not recommend this practice based on my recent experience.

I was advised that a tooth required assessment by a root canal specialist and that extraction with implant placement may be necessary due to an alleged abscess and failed root canal. This was presented alongside a significant amount of additional proposed treatment, amounting to thousands of pounds.

I sought a second opinion from a specialist dentist where I was informed that the diagnosis provided by Sky Dental was incorrect. While an onlay was recommended as a precaution, the tooth did not have the faults that had been suggested and the more invasive treatments discussed were not required.

In addition to this, I attended a hygienist appointment at the practice shortly afterwards. My composite bonding had been in excellent condition for nearly three years. Following the hygiene visit, I was left with visibly roughened, dull surfaces on the bonding, which had not been present before. I have since been advised that the likely cause was the use of an overly abrasive instrument or polishing method. As a result, I now have to pay for a composite refresh at additional cost.

Overall, I was advised to have thousands of pounds for treatment that was not necessary and have been left with damaged composite bonding that will cost hundreds to repair.

This experience has been both financially and professionally disappointing.