Krova Cloud Arvostelua 

Been running a GitHub self-hosted runner on Krova for about five months for our CI builds. The reason I moved off GitHub-hosted runners was build times and cost on a fairly active repo, and honestly it's been a good call. I spin the Cube up in the morning when the team is pushing code and shut it down at night, which keeps the bill predictable and so far that routine has been rock solid. Docker builds are faster on our own runner, and caching layers locally has cut a lot of wasted minutes. Setup wasn't hard if you've registered a self-hosted runner before, and the isolation means I'm not losing sleep over a runner sitting exposed. It's self-managed, so expect to handle updates and the runner config yourself, but for the control and savings it's well worth it.

Running a production app on Cubes for about six months and it's been genuinely uneventful, which is exactly what I want from hosting. Got Dokploy up with Docker, Next.js and Postgres without much fuss, and deploys have been clean. The isolation model is the part I actually appreciate, nothing is exposed until I open it. Snapshot restores have bailed me out once after a bad update. Self-managed, so know your way around SSH, otherwise great value.

I moved my client sites onto Krova Cubes about three months back and haven't had a reason to look elsewhere. No downtime that a client noticed, which is honestly the whole job.

The security setup is what sold me. Every Cube runs its own kernel, and nothing on it is reachable from outside until I open that port myself. On a normal VPS you're exposed from the first boot and then you spend an evening with ufw and fail2ban. Here that's just the default.

Snapshots have saved me twice already after a plugin update went bad. Restore took a minute.

Only thing: it's self managed, so you do need to be comfortable in SSH. If that's fine for you, it's very good value.