Google Maps Arvostelua 28

Stupid platform where clearly fake accounts are spamming a place with 5 stars yet their useless report system didn't detect it, the irony accounts named in pattern that relates to the business owner and the only difference is that they're numbered for example accounts are named like "samebusinessname1" samebusinessname2
samebusinessname3 etc

So, my honest review based on actual experience was withdrawn and I only found out later. That invalidates every review they publish. Only those apporved by customers with money are allowed.

جوجل مابس اوقات منيح واوقات سيء
احيانا بيقترح عليك طرق اطول في المشي لمكان معين مثلا 20 دقيقة وفي الواقع تجد اختصار لهاد المكان وبتقدر تمشيله 6 دقائق فقط، صار معي هاد الاشي في اكثر من دولة.
وكمان اوقات بيقترح طرق ما الها وجود ف بيطلعطك ع قمة جبل او بينزلك في وادي وهو اصلا ما في طريق

Total waste of time using Google map reviews. Google maps AI is useless. And companies can request your honest review of there company is blocked. Also Google maps will not allow you to review Google maps don't like free speech!!!!

Got something like 860k total views and then Google stop publishing my reviews as they were perceived as volating some draconian rules that some complete & utter moron had come up with.

Il semblerait que Google Maps, tout comme Avis Vérifiés, ne retient que des avis positifs sur les professionnels à évaluer.
Malgré des détails précis sur les difficultés rencontrées (ici, il s'agit de l'agence bancaire BPO de Saint Martin des Champs - Finistère), Google Maps me balade, au gré de son humeur, en retirant ou en agréant mon avis sur cet établissement pourtant peu respectueux vis à vis de ses clients...
Bref, éviter de commenter sur se site qui n'est plus sérieux du tout.
P.S. en cas de réponse je n'accepte ni vos excuses ni votre bla-bla stérile : remettez simplement mon avis sur BPO Saint Martin Des Champs en ligne !

Very clumsy user interface gave me lots of useless information

1. Reviews: they automatically unpublish about half my reviews because their software decides I have broken a rule, only to reinstate them after I appeal. Maybe they should use AI instead of this clearly inadequate checking software.

2. Directions: in urban environments, they often give me itineraries that take longer time because traffic is slow, and they often give me longer itineraries because they prefer streets classified as main even when there are lower-classified streets that are better and less congested.

3. Map: there are too many inaccuracies, like telling you to take a street that is closed or turn left where left turn is not allowed. In rural areas, too many road and street names are missing.

Le système de modération des avis de Google Maps est, dans mon cas, totalement dépourvu de crédibilité.

J’ai voulu publier un avis sur Uber à propos d’une interaction réelle, dont je possède des preuves, notamment des captures d’écran de mes échanges avec l’entreprise. Pourtant, Google Maps a bloqué mon avis comme s’il était faux.

Le problème est simple : la plateforme me permet uniquement de faire appel via un bouton, mais ne me permet pas de joindre la moindre preuve. Je ne peux donc ni transmettre mes captures d’écran ni démontrer la réalité de l’interaction. Dans ces conditions, Google Maps ne vérifie rien sérieusement : la plateforme décide par défaut, sans véritable examen contradictoire.

Autrement dit, Google Maps peut qualifier un avis de “faux” ou l’écarter sans donner à l’utilisateur les moyens de prouver qu’il dit vrai. Ce n’est pas un système fiable ; c’est un système arbitraire qui, en pratique, protège les entreprises bien plus qu’il ne protège l’exactitude des avis.

Une plateforme d’avis qui refuse les preuves lorsqu’elle bloque un commentaire perd toute autorité morale et une grande partie de sa valeur pratique.

I had traffic court today and it was at one. I put in the address on the app and it took me to a totally different location in which made me late for court. I would not refer y’all to anybody because that matter right there could cause you chill time warrant for your arrest, etc.. I am very disappointed and I always use y’all and then all of a sudden my court date y’all make me miss it. It’s pretty messed up just like the time y’all made me take four rights in Texas and then I hit a hog after I seen McCarthy Road which is my last name. How ironic I mean, are y’all trying to take me out?

Das Team lehnt ständig Bewertungen ab, da diskriminierend. Vor allem als ich das bei Google Hamburg machte und selbst kritisch zu sein Zack war es entfernt.
Was ein Jammer.
Maps nutze ich sowieso kaum und wenn schlechte Bewertungen entfernt werden Brauch ich Maps ja gar nicht mehr

A bus stop is closed so I suggest a change which is declined after literally 30 seconds. The driver told me it is closed and then google maps says it checks its edits for 'Accuracy'

Awful opportunity for the business
Thanks to you guys

It is a good map service but they are terrible at transparency. I'm not allowed to give a 1 star review for some place because google seems to disagree with me? For example if I give a church a Q star they remove it because that is "insensitive"...

Reseña detallada sobre Google Maps y SocialYou S.L:

Hace años que dejé una reseña honesta en Google Maps para alertar sobre estas prácticas. Sin embargo, recientemente mi apelación ha sido denegada y la reseña eliminada, alegando que “no seguía sus políticas”, previo pago de Social You.

Quiero advertir a otros usuarios sobre SocialYou S.L., una empresa española que ofrece ofertas de trabajo falsas y recopila datos de usuarios para venderlos a terceros.

Esto refleja dos problemas graves y relacionados:

Google Maps: un sistema que permite silenciar críticas legítimas mediante políticas generales aplicadas de manera arbitraria, favoreciendo indirectamente a empresas con influencia o dinero.

SocialYou S.L.: prácticas engañosas que priorizan el beneficio económico sobre la seguridad, transparencia y bienestar de los usuarios.

Si intentas proteger a otros usuarios señalando abusos, terminas siendo censurado, lo que demuestra que las plataformas protegen a los abusadores y perjudican a quienes denuncian injusticias.

Este tipo de práctica es completamente injusta, egoísta y patética, y debería preocupar a cualquier usuario que busque información veraz antes de interactuar con esta empresa o confiar en la plataforma que aloja sus opiniones.

Los consumidores merecen:
-Información clara y transparente sobre empresas y servicios
-Que las plataformas prioricen la seguridad y la justicia, no el beneficio económico
-Que las críticas legítimas no sean eliminadas por políticas vagas o excusas corporativas

SocialYou S.L. y plataformas como Google Maps deberían respetar a los usuarios y actuar con integridad, no permitir que empresas abusivas silencien voces críticas.

¡La España patética en Acción!

I've been using Google Maps since its inception. Although my experience used to be overwhelmingly positive, their recent changes, the subsequent Timeline history data loss, and privacy concerns led me to Apple Maps. I purchased a subscription to the Life Cycle app to keep track of my time. It includes automatic backup and some analytics, much like what Google Maps aims to provide, but I just no longer trust it. It's a shame. I ended up deleting most of the content I contributed to Google Maps in protest of what they did to the product.

TOTALLY USELESS SHOWS CAR PARKED TWO HOUSES ABOVE WHERE IT IS ?
WILL NOT LET ME MOVE IT TO CORRECT LOCATION ON PIN DROP !