Aquaint Capital Arvostelua 

I subscribed expecting more frequent notes giving the monthly price, but some months there were only one or two new pieces added to the archive. I emailed to ask about the publishing schedule, but it took over a week to receive a response. By then, I had already decided to cancel.
The writing itself is good when new pieces are published, but I personally needed more regular content to feel that the subscription was worth the price. Overall, the new issue for me was the amount of new material being added each month rather than the quality of the writing itself.

I signed up for the reader plan after hearing about it elsewhere. The monthly briefing is well written and there's nothing particularly wrong with it, but so far I haven't found myself changing my approach or decisions because of it. It may be more useful for me once I have more money to allocate. For now, I'm cancelling, but I may come back to it later.

Third renewal. Still reading it every month. Still good.

I burned through two expensive trading newsletters before this, both just yelling about the next big move. Aquaint is different. I'm on the Reader plan and the monthly briefing plus the archive is genuinely enough for someone managing their own retirement account. The credit and rates stuff finally makes sense to me. Not flashy, just useful.

We use this at our firm mainly for the macro and rates commentary and it is genuinely well written, not just repackaged headlines. My only gripe is the equity research side feels thinner than the other desks, I would use more single sector notes if they existed.
Still renewing though, the parts that are strong are strong enough to make up for it.